Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
2.
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol ; 3(1): e63, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2271852

ABSTRACT

Deploying therapeutics for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has proved challenging due to evolving evidence, supply shortages, and conflicting guideline recommendations. We conducted a survey on remdesivir use and the role of stewardship. Use differs significantly from guidelines. Hospitals with remdesivir restrictions were more guideline concordant. Formulary restrictions can be important for pandemic response.

4.
Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE ; 2(1), 2022.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2156918

ABSTRACT

Objective: To describe antimicrobial resistance before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in the Dominican Republic. Design: Retrospective study. Setting: The study included 49 outpatient laboratory sites located in 13 cities nationwide. Participants: Patients seeking ambulatory microbiology testing for urine and bodily fluids Methods: We reviewed antimicrobial susceptibility reports for Escherichia coli isolates from urine and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSAR) from bodily fluids between January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, from deidentified susceptibility data extracted from final culture results. Results: In total, 27,718 urine cultures with E. coli and 2,111 bodily fluid cultures with PSAR were included in the analysis. On average, resistance to ceftriaxone was present in 25.19% of E. coli isolated from urine each year. The carbapenem resistance rates were 0.15% for E. coli and 3.08% for PSAR annually. The average rates of E. coli with phenotypic resistance consistent with possible extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) in urine were 25.63% and 24.75%, respectively, before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The carbapenem resistance rates in urine were 0.11% and 0.20%, respectively, a 200% increase. The average rates of PSAR with carbapenem resistance in bodily fluid were 2.33% and 3.84% before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively, a 130% percent increase. Conclusions: Resistance to carbapenems in PSAR and E. coli after the COVID-19 pandemic is rising. These resistance patterns suggest that ESBL is common in the Dominican Republic. Carbapenem resistance was uncommon but increased after the COVID-19 pandemic.

5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(43): 1591-1594, 2020 Oct 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1380140

ABSTRACT

Data on transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), among college athletes are limited. In August 2020, the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH) was notified of a cluster of COVID-19 cases among a university's men's and women's soccer teams. CDPH initiated an investigation, interviewed members of both teams, and collated laboratory data to understand transmission of SARS-CoV-2 within the teams. Numerous social gatherings with limited mask use or social distancing preceded the outbreak. Transmission resulted in 17 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases across both teams (n = 45), likely from a single source introduction of SARS-CoV-2 (based on whole genome sequencing) and subsequent transmission during multiple gatherings. Colleges and universities are at risk for COVID-19 outbreaks because of shared housing and social gatherings where recommended prevention guidance is not followed. Improved strategies to promote mask use and social distancing among college-aged adults need to be implemented, as well as periodic repeat testing to identify asymptomatic infections and prevent outbreaks among groups at increased risk for infection because of frequent exposure to close contacts in congregate settings on and off campus.


Subject(s)
Athletes/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Soccer , Students/statistics & numerical data , Universities , Adolescent , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19 Testing , Chicago/epidemiology , Contact Tracing , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Male , Masks/statistics & numerical data , Physical Distancing , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Young Adult
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(11): 2920-2926, 2020 12 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1059706

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outbreaks of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported in nursing homes and assisted living facilities; however, the extent of asymptomatic and presymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in this high-risk population remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted an investigation of the first known outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 at a skilled nursing facility (SNF) in Illinois on 15 March 2020 and followed residents for 30 days. We tested 126/127 residents for SARS-CoV-2 via reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and performed symptom assessments. We calculated the point prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 and assessed symptom onset over 30-day follow-up to determine: (1) the proportion of cases who were symptomatic, presymptomatic, and asymptomatic and (2) incidence of symptoms among those who tested negative. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to determine the 30-day probability of death for cases. RESULTS: Of 126 residents tested, 33 had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 on 15 March. Nineteen (58%) had symptoms at the time of testing, 1 (3%) developed symptoms over follow-up, and 13 (39%) remained asymptomatic. Thirty-five residents who tested negative on 15 March developed symptoms over follow-up; of these, 3 were re-tested and 2 were positive. The 30-day probability of death among cases was 29%. CONCLUSIONS: SNFs are particularly vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2, and residents are at risk of severe outcomes. Attention must be paid to preventing outbreaks in these and other congregate care settings. Widespread testing and infection control are key to help prevent COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in these high-risk populations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Disease Outbreaks , Humans , Illinois/epidemiology , Skilled Nursing Facilities
7.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 42(6): 743-745, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-882836

ABSTRACT

Strategies for pandemic preparedness and response are urgently needed for all settings. We describe our experience using inverted classroom methodology (ICM) for COVID-19 pandemic preparedness in a small hospital with limited infection prevention staff. ICM for pandemic preparedness was feasible and contributed to an increase in COVID-19 knowledge and comfort.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Hospitals, Urban/organization & administration , Personnel, Hospital/education , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Feasibility Studies , Hospital Bed Capacity , Humans , Teaching/organization & administration
8.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(1): 46-51, 2020 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-3682

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Personal protective equipment (PPE) is a primary strategy to protect health care personnel (HCP) from infectious diseases. When transmission-based PPE ensembles are not appropriate, HCP must recognize the transmission pathway of the disease and anticipate the exposures to select PPE. Because guidance for this process is extremely limited, we proposed a systematic, risk-based approach to the selection and evaluation of PPE ensembles to protect HCP against infectious diseases. METHODS: The approach used in this study included the following 4 steps: (1) job hazard analysis, (2) infectious disease hazard analysis, (3) selection of PPE, and (4) evaluation of selected PPE. Selected PPE should protect HCP from exposure, be usable by HCP, and fit for purpose. RESULTS: The approach was demonstrated for the activity of intubation of a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus. As expected, the approach led to the selection of different ensembles of PPE for these 2 pathogens. DISCUSSION: A systematic risk-based approach to the selection of PPE will help health care facilities and HCP select PPE when transmission-based precautions are not appropriate. Owing to the complexity of PPE ensemble selection and evaluation, a team with expertise in infectious diseases, occupational health, the health care activity, and related disciplines, such as human factors, should be engaged. CONCLUSIONS: Participation, documentation, and transparency are necessary to ensure the decisions can be communicated, critiqued, and understood by HCP.


Subject(s)
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Personal Protective Equipment/classification , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Humans , Infection Control , Risk Factors , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/transmission , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL